Milk and blood. Page 1 of 2

Milk is extraordinary. Animals produce it and feed to their young. It’s like no other substance on earth. Of course though we could say that anything is extraordinary , but if we were to just focus on milk and wonder how it evolved , we would get nowhere. Problem is , that when we say that an animal evolved , we would have to consider how the milk in the animal also evolved from non milk. In the life of a baby , the milk that is given to the baby changes it’s constituents like immunization properties throughout the development of the baby. And all animals that have milk have a different kind of milk with all sorts of different things that change over the time of the baby that is being fed the milk.
It’s a simple thought , but how would the essence of our theory of evolution of natural selection and random mutations have anything to do with milk. In a flash of thought we know that milk did not evolve.
Seems like silly thinking , but evolution is said to be the explanation about how all life and plants progress from their beginnings. We don’t of course understand the beginnings of them , but to imagine that milk came about and then evolved to do what it does , makes no sense.

Like milk , blood and it’s composition of white cells and immunity things and it’s ability to carry oxygen through the body would surely not rely on the natural selection idea. Blood has veins to carry it and a heart to pump it around. Blood on it’s own would be useless. And the heart and veins would also be useless without the blood flowing through them. So the whole setup and their compositions would have to exist in one go. Leaving this idea of natural selection and even evolution without any evidence at all to linger in people’s minds or consciousness or whatever to explain all these life things stops all thought.

freepik.com

This kind of wondering about how the milk and the blood and a heart and veins exist to work with each other is explained away by saying it all happened over millions of years. That is that evolution has had millions of years to do do it. But even eyes existed 500 million years ago and so did blood and probably milk, and the animals with those eyes and blood and milk could move. Common sense thinking would say that even if you went back in time one day at a time you wouldn’t get to a day when the milk and blood and veins and heart existed on their own. They would all have to exist at the same time.

Also the blood and milk would have different immunity and other things over time but each of those new things wouldn’t have accidentally evolved. If a new immunity property to fight a new disease is in the blood or milk it would not be in the milk or blood because it was naturally selected. It would be in the milk or blood to fight the new disease and we cannot explain it. We try to explain it by saying that it was an accidental genetic mutation and that because it was beneficial it was naturally selected to continue. That doesn’t make any sense.

And it’s not just the physical structures of them. What makes the heart pump the blood around the body at maybe 70 beats in a minute. A biology book might say that electrical signals are sent by the brain to change the heart beat rate when we move or see something or think something. So now we have to add a brain to make it four things that are needed. The brain is very busy. Blood and milk are just two of goodness knows how many fluids that are in the body. Thinking would then be , what is being sent to the brain to enable the brain to send the electrical signals. It would go on and on. Hard to think that the brain is reliant on nothing else whereas the organs etc are reliant on the brain. No idea.

It’s just quite bizarre how our thinking has come to try to explain life using natural selection and accidental random mutations based mainly on finding fossils of what would once have been whole animals. Polar bears in the snowy Arctic surely don’t have white fur because white fur was naturally selected. It’s been conjectured though that there were some albino bears and they were naturally selected , but that’s simply our conjecture.

If we found that life on other planets has blood , we would have to wonder even more on how blood exists. It sort of seems quite likely that those animals on another planet would have blood, unless life on earth is a one off and life on other planets are totally different. That seems like 100 percent unlikely. So if they do have blood , where would our thinking about it go.

Would we think that the blood evolved on the the other planets as well , or would we instantly think that blood is a one off thing. If blood is universal then it’s difficult to say that blood evolved here on earth and that it also evolved on other planets. The same would be for flesh and bones and organs etc. We would have to wonder how random mutations and natural selection came together on all planets to come up with the same fluids and substances. Of course there are also legs to walk and eyes to see. It is hard to imagine that our evolution theories using random mutations and natural selection would somehow produce the same body parts and fluids on all planets in the universe.

If we sort of agree among each other with our thoughts that on other planets life could or probably does exist , then we imagine animals and plants with similarities in body organs etc that they have , even if the animals or plants are different looking in shape. That would leave us also having to say that they evolved on their planets and that they evolved the same things like blood and noses and the fancying thing etc. That would mean that the possibilities of them existed before they came to be , and that our idea of natural selection , would not be selecting the best random mutations to produce any part of an animal or plant.

If any animal started off as chemicals in the soil of their planet and were say a few million years later a horse with a skeleton and a heart and blood and lungs etc , then we would have to throw away our natural selection acting on random mutations ideas. If horses exist on other planets it would mean that the horse was always going to be a horse. The bones and blood in a horse on a planet in maybe another galaxy would have to have evolved or they didn’t. The horses skeleton and eyes and lungs would have to have evolved like we might think they evolved here on our planet. We all imagine that life on other planets are like here on our planet. But how would they all have blood and all the rest using our evolution theories.

Of course , that’s just the physicalities. The horse is doing some sort of thinking. So the thinking of the horse on earth might be the same as the thinking in a horse on another planet in another galaxy. It would be a bit of a stretch to imagine that the horses on different planets and in different galaxies rely on our evolution ideas for them to be able to think in the way that they do.

Next page Blood and milk page 2

Home