chapters page 2

It has of course to start with the old question of how is there a man and a woman. There can be no presumptions to what the answer could be because we just don’t don’t know. But a man and a woman do exist and differ from each other , and we have to then ask , does our idea of evolution play a part in that difference , or is that difference too succinct to have evolved. The difference is of course more than unexplainable. You and me are one or the other , and we don’t mind , but how it exists surely can’t be said to have evolved. The difference in some way just exists , so why do we think that our evolution ideas have anything to do with not just that man and women difference , but anything at all. A man and a woman would need some kind of explaining as to how evolution would bring either about. Simple thought says that a man and a woman exist.

There are other thoughts we might also ask like why is living so hard and painful when an animal can exist in the first place. You’d think that the coming about of any animal would not leave the animal to suffer. No idea. But that’s some other kind of thinking.
Again , this is just about our evolution ideas.

At once , we know that our theory of evolution has nothing to do with the actual occurrence of the man and woman difference. Our evolution ideas are about physical changes and developments. How could or would any evolution process come up with the two different body plans that are able to make babies. Not just man and woman , but millions of other male and female setups that exist and existed millions of years before the human man and woman.
Just seems that our evolution theory doesn’t come up with male and female and it therefore begs the question as to why we think that any animal at all has evolved.

We could maybe imagine that humans have evolved using evolution from some other animal that were male and female . Nothing wrong with the idea in itself , as we could imagine that since male and female animals existed before humans then some animal could have evolved into humans. But , it is quite a leap to ignore the fact that the animal that could have evolved into humans , already had the body parts of male and female. The phenomena of male and female would have to be explained before any conjecture of evolution could be considered as useful.

Evolution theory says that random mutations in animal bodies are key and that natural selection allows in some way the success of the best.
If we follow that thought through with the idea that humans are today the way that they are , then there would have to have been some sort of of natural selection to natural deselection , because the monkey or ape or whatever humans evolved from , had fur , and humans are left with almost just eyebrows and eye lashes. Every single person on earth has eyebrows and eyelashes.
How. No this or that did it. No idea. But basically there is no evidence at all to show that any evolution ideas are fact. Am not postulating in here anything other than our evolution theory lacks evidence and that the evolution sort of thinking could be wrong , very wrong.

The theories are ours. We sort of know that, but we don’t even know how we sort of know that. Obviously we don’t even know anything about how we are thinking about what we are , but our conjectures must be weak and wrong against the reality. Hard to understand why we are in this position , but we can’t think outside of our thinking. So to think that evolution theory has anything to do with a man and a woman and any other animals that have a male and female set up , requires some evidence. There is just no evidence at all to show how that difference evolved. Just seems that animals and trees and plants , don’t require evolution for them to be here today or there tomorrow.

We could think of other specificities like blood and milk , and wonder about whether they exist on other planets along with eggs and fruits. If they do exist on other planets along with males and females that have hearts and lungs , then we would more conclude that they are all universal phenomena and don’t rely on our evolution ideas. A phenomena is a whole. There is no in between.

Would all of the other physical phenomena like a brain or a toe nail or a set of teeth in reality mess around relying on our invention of natural selection to choose from our other invention , random mutations.
Just looking at our own pair of legs with feet and five toes at the end of each of them with toe nails would make anyone wonder how on earth have these words like natural selection and random mutations crept into our thinking. Quite simply , why are these niggly thoughts about evolution there. Why are they there at all.

The word ‘evolution’ carries with it a weight that drowns out common sense. Even if the physicality’s evolved in some way , we surely can’t put the phenomena of them down to random mutations and natural selection. A flower that comes into bloom every spring and the existence of legs and feet that make walking possible , surely don’t use our evolution theory conjectures to be what they are.
Then there are ducks that float on water and paddle using webbed feet. It doesn’t feel when you watch them , that they have relied on an evolutionary process to come up with all the necessary parts to be a duck , never mind a male duck and a female duck.

freepik.com

Before any phenomena like males and females , there was nothing , so we don’t know how any of them came to exist and we certainly can’t explain how just that one phenomena continues. Since that one phenomena of male and female somehow comes about , then it would surely be common sense to think that it would use whatever it used to come about in the first place to carry on.
And just that one phenomena of male and female would definitely not rely on what conjectures we have come up with. Put simply , the phenomena or the idea of males and females surely didn’t evolve. We can conjecture that the physicality’s of males and females evolved after they came into existence , but can’t conjecture in any way anything about the very existence of the phenomena of males and females. That alone tells us that our evolution idea needs more than a rethink.

Our planet can’t be the first planet that was able to support the type of life that is on our planet. There must be other planets that have rivers and sea and soil. If males and females existed on other planets before our planet had formed , what would that mean. Maybe it would mean that life is sprinkled onto a ready to have life planet. Simple conjecture , but it just seems like planets with life must have existed before even our own galaxy with earth came to be. The science says that life appeared as soon as it could have on planet earth , once things had cooled down enough.
The other way would be that life itself made the planets for itself to live on , like penguins made the icy cold south pole to live in , and lions made the hot African plains to live in.

But however we think about it all , there are other things to think about.
Worms fancy worms , penguins fancy penguins , and giraffes fancy giraffes. What has our evolution idea got to do with how that came about. And other animals 500 million years ago had eyes and other body parts and also fancied their own species.
There is surely absolutely no way to conjecture that they fancied or fancy their own species because of random mutations and natural selection. It is such a specific phenomena.. So why do we conjecture that any whole physical animal or whole physical plant like a tree , relies on random mutations and natural selection to turn from one species to another, if they ever did.

( Am using the word fancy for simplicity. There is so much more of course but just using it for now) We do know though that phenomena are incomprehensible to us , at the moment. But in the main , not one of them can be explained using any evolution ideas.