Conclusions page 3 of 8

Maybe just one more thought on body parts . The eyebrows should set off an alarm bell in us to question our conjectures. It can’t be a sort of coincidence that it just so happens that today , just at this point in time , that we have eyebrows. The idea of evolution would make us think that we have gradually lost almost all of the hair and fur on the body that we would once have had as apes or monkeys or a precursor animal, but are now left with eyebrows because humans with the left over eyebrows to protect the eyes , survived through natural selection.

That again just doesn’t make sense. It surely can’t be that humans have eyebrows as a left over. Surely eyebrows and eyelashes and the hair on our heads are not naturally selected from a once all furry hairy body. There is absolutely no explanation other than eyebrows are there to protect the eyes and the hair on a head is there to keeps everything in the skull warm.

Not sure if dinosaurs had eyebrows , but they lived 200 million years ago. They had all the organs and flesh and blood and senses that we have . There is nothing new about our senses like seeing and hearing. So 200 million years ago all the senses existed. Dinosaurs could see and could hear and had teeth. And animals before had these too.

It could only mean that the possibility of eyes and teeth exist for the animals to use them. We can’t say that a pair of eyes or a set of teeth evolved in or on a dinosaur because the possibility of eyes and teeth already existed before the dinosaur. In our thinking when we see all sorts of animals that have eyes we could only assume that each species of animal used the availability of eyes. To say that they evolved them is non sensical. To think that they also evolved their legs and claws and toe nails is also unnecessary as they must have been possibilities that can be used. There is then the idea of legs and feet that can stand and walk to have the correct weight that can balance in the earths gravity. But beyond any of that , is how does the idea of a pair of legs come about to walk in the first place.

On humans. If we start from dinosaurs , then 198 million years later humans appear. Then in a remarkably short time scale out of nowhere , a few book writers have popped up to have a go at explaining evolution to the layman . The books can be 300 pages long but when whittled down to actual evidence then there might only be one page in them.. Just possibilities and if’s and maybes and full on conjectures. Some go on tour , but in the YouTube’s of them they don’t ever pull out of their pockets a single fossil. Can find fossils in the back garden. ( I must stop this sarkiness ) . Certainly though not explaining those eyebrows and eye lashes.

Also no explanation of how a human made a fridge to keep food cold or made glass to look out of a car window. Or make tin cans to store beans in. Without all of those we would more than struggle. Imagine it. , living today with no fridge or glass windows in the house. Glass is so important to our today existence . But again in the main it is not fair on teachers and scientists to use those books to tell others that all of these things exist or happened because of random mutations and natural selection. Eyes existed 500 million years ago. Those eyes or eyebrows and eyelashes and fridges or glass have nothing to do with our evolution ideas. Or at least there is no real evidence of it.

Time on that scale is hard to imagine. But if you play with it and start with say ten generations of a human going backwards you don’t have to imagine 500 million years. Just a few years compared to that number. Even if it is say two or five million years since the monkey or ape or whatever animal turned into a human being. Then the thousands of generations doesn’t seem so far away. ( In some way I don’t think this will go very far.. will leave till tomorrow.) But all the imaginary image/ drawing possibilities on Google are fictitious.

Somewhere though along the line , nakedness must have been a conscious thought in the human. Somehow we made fires and shoes and clothes to keep us warm , and we can’t easily think that we’d all safely walk around with no clothes on and work in an office or a supermarket or hospital or a coal mine or a fish and chip shop. We seem to be the most body exposed animal on earth. No other animal puts clothes on. Random mutations and natural selection surely has nothing to do with that. No human could easily survive out of the warm regions of the earth without clothes. Thankfully though we have at least been left with a set of eyebrows. Very odd.

That takes some thought. I can’t do it. Why would a monkey or an ape or it’s precursor loose all or most of it’s hair and fur to be so vulnerable to the elements of weather and the landscape and rely on clothes and fire to keep warm. Could even wonder why apes need all that fur in the first place since where the live in Africa is hot. Maybe it was once colder. No idea. But loosing the fur could only be that it was no longer needed to survive. It would sort of leave the thought that they moved to cooler regions and covered their hairy bodies so most of the hair and fur were no longer needed. But it’s hard to imagine that. It would also mean that all of the pets in our warm houses like cats and dogs will loose all of their fur too. Doesn’t at all seem likely. No idea. Guess i’m just trying to think how could just one animal become furless and evolve into a human.

Moving on a bit. The easy one. Not really. The brain. It might not be involved with animals fancying each other. Worms and butterflies and even smaller creatures with just a few brain neural connections find and fancy each other. Then again we don’t know what even one single brain neuron does. But where does that fancying come from. It’s not from mutations and natural selection. It has to exist and it does. Since millions of animals just on our planet have to fancy their own species there could not be any reliance on our imaginary ideas like natural selection acting on random mutations to explain it.

Fancying is too specific. Goldfish fancy goldfish and crocodiles fancy crocodiles. In the evolution of one species to another species a new type of fancying would have to supersede the other one. There can be no random chances of that happening. That is , the new animal species fancies it’s new species that it has turned into. So since there is no chance of that happening through natural selection and random mutations then why would we rely on this human thought conjecture of natural selection and random mutations to be involved with the formation and organisation of whole animals and plants in the first place , and then the changes that would occur in any evolution of all the body parts and chemicals and their composition of flesh and blood and fur and hairiness etc in the future.

Pic from Wikimedia Commons, The sword fish above surely doesn’t have that spikey thing because of evolution or natural selection or random mutations. Very much like legs and toes on humans or any other animal don’t rely on them either. We know with our range of possible thoughts that the word evolution misleads us. We absolutely know with our thoughts that toes and toe nails that are on the feet are just there. We can conjecture all we like , but there is no thought in us to go backwards to anything else other than we have two feet at the end of our two legs. Just simple thought says that the feet at the end of our legs means that words like evolution and random mutations and natural selection are pure conjectures. We just know that toes and feet exist. Just simple thinking tells us not to use evolution ideas to explain brains and toe nails and fancying and male and female and eyebrows.

The word evolution and the thought of it is an odd concept to think about. Basically , surely a pair of feet on the end of a pair legs don’t exist because they evolved. Then the rest of the body connected to the legs manages to balance its self in the gravity of the earth and move around looking for a partner. It might seem silly to talk like this but we are told or informed or taught that animals evolve using random mutations and natural selection. Surely not even a toe nail evolved.

Then there is me talking to you. Out of nowhere you are getting my thoughts on maybe a phone. If we had to think about how we have got my thoughts in that phone from each other and we know nothing about telephone connections and the internet we might conjecture away and ultimately come up with conjectures to explain it. We would come up with all sorts of bonkers ideas about it and none would be right. Somehow though , like that , we are happy with the conjecture of evolution theory based on random mutations and natural selection to explain toe nails and toes and feet connected to a pair of legs.

Next page

Home