Conclusions Page 9 of 9

But it could be thought that the ingredients along with their DNA and genes etc , are there for something to use , and it just looks like the ingredients themselves on their own are turning into the chicken. If nothing else occurs to our thoughts about it , it could in the least be thought of as bizarre as to how this fertilized egg is or was turning into a chicken. I know , was.

commons.wikimedia PaulT (Gunther Tschuch)

So , does the chicken egg have in it , all that is needed to produce legs and wings and a heart etc. Same with any seed. Does a tree seed have in it all that is needed to make a tree that can make more tree seeds that grow into more trees.
In the world of conjecture , is it possible that eggs and seeds are more like signifiers for nature or phenomena’s to do what they do. That is , that the egg or seed is there like a food , with some sort of other information , for nature or the phenomena to do whatever nature and phenomena’s do. That is , here is the egg and here is the seed , and hey presto , nature or the phenomena does it’s thing.

It just seems too extraordinary that all of the possibilities of legs and lungs and blood exist in the egg. It might be so , but that would take more than an evolutionary process to do without the phenomena of them.
Then there is us. We can , using a microscope see the beginnings of a human baby that later will be able talk a language and play the piano. But is all of that possibility contained in the egg. That’s hard to conceive.
Because we can only see an egg , we can only speculate about the egg and watch what it does. But we don’t know what is going on. If there is something else going on we can’t see it.
Would it be possible to put something artificial out to allow the nature or phenomena to act on. More than probably not , as the nature or phenomena most likely would not be fooled. It’s hard to think of such a setup , as everything is biological or tree like.

But , if it were the case that nature or phenomena turn an egg into an animal , then we could maybe find a way to point out and highlight to the nature or phenomena , an illness like cancer or dementia. After all , medicines that we use , highlight to the bodies immune system a virus or infection , and the immune system then goes to work. Medicines themselves don’t make us better.

Making contact with the nature or phenomena needs perhaps something else though. That is , we can alert the physical immune system to illness, but could we also give alert to the nature or phenomena that could sort of be behind an animal or plant. Problem is though that we have some sort of knowledge of the immune system, although just a little , but absolutely no knowledge of phenomena.
One possibility though , to be able to continue in thought about it , is that there is the phenomena of a man and a woman , or a male and a female. At once there are some opportunities to think about. If we could get to the phenomena part of it , we could communicate in some sort of way to the phenomena to alert it to those illnesses. The phenomena could possibly cure in an instant.

So , to end , maybe it’s not too far stretched to think that there is this other concept that we can again for simplicity call nature or phenomena , that can make all of these things that the egg or seed calls for like blood and milk and lungs and toe nails etc , and it gives them all in one go. It’s all been done before so no messing is needed.

The Nature or phenomena thing can perhaps make or bring about blood and milk and lungs without ever having to use our evolution idea. Doesn’t that feel more likely or obvious. Otherwise blood and milk and toe nails evolved , and that makes no sense.
All conjecture , but there is no harm in it , as we just don’t know. It does though feel a bit more prosperous than our evolution theory , even if wrong , and most likely is , as we just don’t know what’s really going on.
Next thought would be that it is the phenomena of or in trees that make wood , and then also that the phenomena in animals make body parts. It would go on and on of course , but it feels that the idea of concepts like animals and vegetation evolved is pretty much over. Just a general thought about it today and a little look on the internet says that evolution theory was and still is trying to be proved through the obsession of collecting and the readings of dusty old books. Things move on.

Just on trees though , they are made of wood. Trees are made of wood. That means that what we call a tree is a structure of wood that we call a tree. That means that the wood that makes the tree is the tree. To make itself , the tree takes carbon out of the air to make the wood. Just a thought , but what we think of as the tree is something that is not the wood , but is the phenomena behind the wooden structure.
Same of course for say a flower that is essentially a structure also made from the carbon taken from the air. Quite how the flower gets it’s shape and colour is probably why we are intrigued by them and grow them in the garden and sell them in the shops. So we do imagine that it is their phenomena which is not their structure or their colours.

But on what is happening and what we see , something could happen soon and it could happen fast and maybe in our time. All of these phenomena like bodies , and all that is in them to make babies exist , might need to be given something new in them for their continuation in changing environments. But there isn’t any evidence of it ever happening in the past. The layers in the earth show that animals appear and go extinct and new animals follow. One big clue is that we have to eat. The whole animal kingdom goes around eating pretty much all day long.

One thing that does change without going extinct is human thought. It must mean that at least some sort of change can occur. We don’t know what the thought thing is, but somehow we know that we have similar thoughts and that they are used to manage our lives.
There are thoughts that we have today that have never happened before. Thoughts , whatever they are , exist in some way , and we presume one persons thoughts are separate to another person’s thoughts. That’s quite something. An individual has it’s individual thoughts. But are they reliant on today or physicality’s or what. No idea.

It’s hard to think that our thinking about what we are , is about as far as it gets. Something is possibly going to happen when today our thoughts, whatever they are , are different to the thoughts of just a few years ago. Of course there are our survival thoughts and nothing over that means more.
But the thoughts that we have must have some sort of implication to the future. It’s not that the earliest humans couldn’t have had the thoughts we today have. They maybe could have the same thoughts but with different knowledge and different times in which to survive. It’s more that the ability to have changing thoughts , is an existence like milk and blood.
But to end , again , in the main, our evidence for any evolution is scant and is based on only a few plausible examples and huge conjectures that have been put together to prove it. There should be mountains of evidence but there is almost none. There should be much more than one liners about this fossil or or this animal etc. So for now ..

Surely no egg or fruit , or set of eyebrows , or set of teeth , or pair of lungs on earth or on any other planet uses our conjecture of evolution. Common sense says that none of these , including blood and milk or X and Y chromosomes, use random mutations and natural selection when somehow they exist in the first place. And in a simple way of thinking , the millions of different dual physical parts that make babies in millions of animals , surely don’t rely on an evolution process to be what they are. Clearly , no animal or tree relies on chance and luck.
In our case there is a man and a woman , so if we were to say that they evolved , we would have to wonder how the actual differences between them occur by evolution alone.
Everything just seems too specific to have evolved , unless it is that life was always going to evolve into what life form they eventually evolved into. But that would mean that evolution had the knowledge to enable some earlier life to turn into into a man and a woman or a tree. It would have in some way have to have known that there is a future and It would also have to know that environments change and be prepared for those changes. That would mean that in us is the propensity to change and even evolve new senses. Somehow that doesn’t feel right.

And , as said earlier , humans will never now evolve in a normal evolution way because we wear clothes , including shoes. We could go silly in thinking and imagine that our feet and toes in the shoes will evolve in some odd way , but the reality is surely that the feet and toes would not be misguided by a pair of shoes. Firstly , the human has to make the shoes and then we’d have to believe that an evolution process would be stumped by those shoes. That would mean that an animal could evolve for say 500 million years and in a short period of time would now have to evolve the feet and toes that are now all day in a pair of shoes. That would mean that evolution couldn’t use natural selection and random mutations in the future , but in reality , probably never used them in the past. Would the number of toes change , would toe nails no longer be needed. It would go on and on of course , but it’s probably more that the foot and it’s toes can manoeuvre in a shoe before the shoe was made , and won’t or don’t need to evolve to work in a shoe just because they are in a shoe.

So , to follow , we’d have to wonder if animals were going to happen in their dualist forms before they even existed. That does feel true. So on words again , we could ask if a man and a woman were meant to come about , since they once didn’t exist. We could say that there were male and females in other animals like the monkey that evolved into the man and woman that we have today. If it wasn’t meant to be , then it would mean that evolution bungles it’s way somehow to come up with a man and a woman.

The idea that they evolved is only in our minds because there is still an ongoing effort to find the physical evidence in more fossils and DNA and genes etc to prove evolution. Those ideas though are pretty much over. There are just never ever going to be any fossils etc that explain the phenomena of a man and a woman. You and me are one or the other , and yes , it is an oddity. But to have that to happen takes a bit more than a progression.
So to end , once again , the evolution idea has had over 150 years to find evidence to explain how a man and a woman exist. The idea has come up with nothing. Therefore the specificities of life , like a man and a woman and eyes and toe nails , in a conjectural sense , could come about more likely because of the phenomena behind or in them. A physicality could or might not rely on something else. But if there is a something else, it could be the phenomena , whatever they are , that makes the physical body and body parts , and moves all of those physicality’s. Maybe we just can’t sense them and Is it unattainable to understand today. But thinking moves on.

But say we do try to imagine for just one moment , that the two eyes that sit in the head of a human on both sides above the nose have evolved to be there. It would mean that even the very first to be evolving eyes , that in some way weren’t eyes to start with , would have to be in the right place to start evolving into eyes. The two of them would have to evolved at the same time in the skull of a head in the first place. Then there is how the eyes sort of knew that light was there and that that light could be physically captured or strike the eyes to bring about sight. That is altogether something else.
Immediately it feels more like it’s a done in a one go occurrence. Quite how an evolution progressive process would also come up with ears on the side of the head at the same time as the brain that they are all connected to, would again say that it’s all done in one go. And it would also have to be thought that way for arms and legs and hearts etc. That is , how would they all end up perfectly situated in the place on the body that they are said to have evolved on.

To end , once again , anyone’s experience of life , like seeing and feeling , is spontaneous , and it has to be. Spontaneity exists in some way perhaps like a toe nail without any evolution process. To perceive or sense just this moment and the dimensions of the space and distances around us , surely didn’t take any sort of evolutionary time or process to come up with that spontaneity. It is instant and always was and always had to be for any animal that ever existed.
Are we ever going to find out why eyes are needed to see and ears are needed to hear and why any animal would want to exist and see and hear in the first place. No idea.
To get to understand is more about how we wonder about how to get to understand. Much is about trying to prove one conjecture or another , but on what we have observed so far , it seems that new animals will come about , however they come about , and will most likely have eyes and ears and eyebrows.
The new animals almost certainly wouldn’t have to evolve teeth again , if they ever did , as it’s all been done before. They could just copy and modify.
Will they eat us. Probably.

Birds do it, bees do it
Even educated fleas do it
Let’s do it, let’s fall in love .. and lots more

Home