Conclusions  Page 9 of 10

So. It could it be thought in the world of conjecture , that the ingredients along with their DNA and genes etc , are there for something to use , and it just looks like the ingredients themselves on their own are turning into the chicken. If nothing else occurs to our thoughts about it , it could in the least be thought of as bizarre as to how this fertilized egg was going to grow into a chicken on it’s own.

commons.wikimedia PaulT (Gunther Tschuch)

So , does the chicken egg have in it , all that is needed to produce legs and wings and a heart etc. Same with any seed. Does a tree seed have in it all that is needed to make a tree that can make more tree seeds that grow into more trees.
In the world of conjecture , is it possible that eggs and seeds are more like signifiers for nature or phenomena’s to do what they do. That is , that the egg or seed is there like a food , with some sort of other information , for nature or the phenomena to do whatever nature and phenomena’s do. That is , here is the egg and here is the seed , and hey presto , nature or the phenomena does it’s thing.

It just seems too extraordinary with the thoughts that we can have , that all of the possibilities of legs and lungs and blood exist in an undeveloped egg. It could be and might be that they do, but even if all of that possibility does exist in the egg , that surely would have taken more than our evolutionary process for it to be that way.
Is that kind of intellect over. That is , to get to any present state , did anything have to evolve.

Then there is us. We can , using a microscope see the beginnings of a human baby that later will be able talk a language and play the piano. But is all of that possibility contained in the initial egg. That’s hard to conceive. It’s not a case of overlooking something , we simply wouldn’t know what we could be overlooking , but to say that all of what is in an egg or a seed evolved to be and do what it could later do , is inventive only. Given that kind of logic we’d have to explain how the body parts and what they will be able to do , evolved in an egg. That is like giving the to be animal with all it’s body parts a place to evolve in without explaining the egg in which it grows and evolves.

Maybe the thought that the potential for the ingredients to play a piano is superficial , as there are more musical instruments for us to make sound and tunes with. But it might be that we have pretty much found all of the ways to make different sounds in the last few hundred years.
Would that be the same for features like ears on the side of our head though. Probably not. That feels different. That is , we put together musical instruments to cause disturbances in the air that construct sound waves that our ears pick up and the sense of hearing somehow occurs when the ears receive those sound waves. Ears only pick up certain sound waves. Every animal has different ears that pick up different sound waves and some animals make a noise that creates sound waves that get bounced back to their ears that shows them their environment in the dark. That could equate to 20 musical instruments times 8 million different animal ear senses. But the ears are there to pick up the sound waves and eyes sort of react to light. Those physical constructs that grow to pick up sound and sight are somehow inside the shell of the chicken egg.

So because we can only see the inside of an egg developing and know that whatever is inside will soon be able to hear and see , we can only speculate about the egg and watch what it does to be able to do the things that it does. But we don’t know what is going on.
If there is something else going on , we can’t see it. And that is the fault with evolution theory. It’s far more than a fault though. Evolution theory is a thought that pervades with absolutely no evidence at all. We don’t know how all that is wrapped in an animal egg came to be. Same for a tree or any flower seed. But to say that what is in them evolved and evolved to do everything that they do is futile. That’s all that is being said here.

Would it be possible to put something artificial out to allow the nature or phenomena to act on. More than probably not , as the nature or phenomena most likely would not be fooled. It’s hard to think of such a setup , as everything is biological or tree like. But , if it were the case that nature or phenomena turns whatever is is in an egg into an animal , then we could maybe find a way to point out and highlight to the nature or phenomena an illness like cancer or dementia. After all , medicines that we use , highlight to the bodies immune system a virus or infection , and the immune system then goes to work.

Making contact with the nature or phenomena needs perhaps something else though. That is , we can alert the physical immune system to illness with chemicals, but how could we alert the nature or phenomena that could sort of be behind an animal or plant. Problem is though that we have some sort of knowledge of the immune system, although just a little , but absolutely no knowledge of phenomena.
One possibility though , to be able to continue in thought about it , is that there is the phenomena of a man and a woman , or a male and a female. At once there are some opportunities to think about. If we could get to the phenomena part of it , we could communicate in some sort of way to the phenomena to alert it to those illnesses. The phenomena could possibly cure in an instant.

So we fancy or like the look of the the male or the female. It exists in different ways. We might think of it as a biological thing or as an instinct , we just don’t know. But if we could swap that fancying around with just our thoughts we could be in contact with phenomena. Nobody at all though wants to change what they are.
Imagine being offered a pill that that will take away any concern that we might have about ourselves. The reality is that we would rather hold on to the concern to be safe in the knowledge that the concern is for very real and good reason , like being fearful of heights or spiders. Just generalising of course , as there are extremes.


So , to end , maybe it’s not too far stretched to think that there is this other concept that we can again for simplicity call nature or phenomena , that can make all of these things that the egg or seed calls for like blood and milk and lungs and toe nails etc , and it gives them all in one go. It’s all been done before so no messing is needed.
Simple. Probably , but who knows , and it’s not easy to compare it to hard work.
That is that the nature or phenomena thing can perhaps make or bring about blood and milk and lungs without ever having to use our evolution idea. Doesn’t that feel more likely or obvious. Otherwise blood and milk and lungs and toe nails evolved , and that makes no sense. We would have to wonder what they evolved from and how they evolved from what they once were into what they are and what they do.

All conjecture , but there is no harm in it , as we just don’t know. It does though feel a bit more prosperous than our evolution theory , even if wrong , and most likely is , as we just don’t know what’s really going on.
Next thought would be that it is the phenomena of or in trees that make wood , and then also that the phenomena in animals make all of the body parts. It would go on and on of course , but it feels that the idea of concepts like animals and vegetation having evolved is pretty much over. Just a general thought about it today and a little look on the internet says that evolution theory was and still is trying to be proved through the obsession of collecting fossils and the reading of dusty old books with sketches of fish slowly growing legs and moving onto land. Things move on.

Just on trees , they are made of wood. Trees are made of wood. That means that what we call a tree is a structure of wood that we call a tree. That means that the wood that makes the tree is the tree. To make itself , the tree takes carbon out of the air to make the wood and it literally grows minute by minute. We might say that the tree has evolved from some earlier plant , but we couldn’t say that the ability to take the carbon from the air to grow evolved.
Just a thought , but what we unconsciously think of as the tree is something that is not the wood , but could be thought of as the phenomena behind the wooden structure.
Same of course for say a flower that is essentially a structure also made from the carbon taken from the air. Quite how the flower gets it’s shape and colour is probably why we are intrigued by them and grow them in the garden and sell them in the shops. But we could more imagine that it is their phenomena that grabs our attention which is not their structure or their colours , even though we think it is there structure and colour that grabs our attention. That is , that at the back of our liking of what we see , we are unknowingly trying to work out how they come about to be what they are. Not all the time of course , but it wouldn’t strike us that they evolved unless someone else told us that they evolved.
Mary, Mary quite contrary,
How does your garden grow?

Photo by Robert Sperling wikimedia commons.
Seeds only produce the same flower that laid the seed. How would the evolution idea allow millions of varieties to exist and continue. This here is just about the idea of evolution. Firstly each seed that will turn into it’s species of flower would have to have evolved it’s ability to turn into it’s species of flower. That’s inconceivable.
The evolving after that could be thought as possible , but the evolving would be trivial to the ability of being a seed that grows into a a flower of any variety. We could say , that the flower itself makes it’s own seed , but we know or feel that we don’t make our own eggs that turn into our babies and so the flower is probably much like us in that it itself doesn’t have anything to with it’s own existence. That’s a bit of a problem. Again though , just saying that there is no evidence that anything evolved or evolves.

But on what is happening and what we see , could something happen soon and fast and maybe in our time. All of these phenomena , like bodies made of flesh and blood and trees and flowers made of leaves and wood , and all that is in them to make babies exist and more trees and plants to exist , might need to be given something new in them for their continuation in changing environments.

Our evolution theory says that random mutations and natural selection is how that will occur in the future. Problem is that there isn’t any evidence of it ever happening in the past. Again , don’t trust me. I’m just looking at pages on google. So just my thoughts. But the layers in the earth show only that animals appear and go extinct and new animals follow.
We can think of one million years from now and imagine that the life that could be then existing has relied on our concept of evolution. But it isn’t just that these physicality’s exist.
It is that they have abilities such as trees producing seeds to make more trees. How would just the idea of trees being able to produce seeds evolve , never mind the actual happening of it. If there are new animals or new vegetation in a million years time , they could have their own ways to populate. Those ways might be similar or even the same , but those ways are not necessarily inherent. That is , the way to make more trees is by using seeds , and we might imagine that that way of doing it evolved earlier and continues into the future. Common sense thinking though would say that we can’t comprehend any of it and certainly couldn’t say that evolution did it all.

One big clue to understanding anything might be that we have to eat and so do the trees and plants in a sort of way. The whole animal kingdom and plant kingdom go around eating pretty much all day long. Why ? How is it that they use that way to be. It’s importance is so necessary of course , but how would an evolutionary process come up with that. To explain it we might say that the first tiny organism somehow absorbed food through it’s membrane and then went on a few years later to get teeth that nicely fit in the gums of a mouth. That’s quite a leap , even if it took a million years to do. Then with the same kind of thought we’d have to assume that trees , before they were trees , found that leaves at the end of their branches was a good way to take in carbon from the air to produce their form. It would go on of course.

One thing that does change without going extinct is human thought. Of course it would go extinct if the human goes extinct but it continues to think different thoughts while it exists. It must mean that at least some sort of change can occur. We don’t know what the thought thing is, but somehow we know that we have similar thoughts and that they are used to manage our lives.
There are thoughts that we have today that have never happened before. Thoughts , whatever they are , exist in some way , and we presume one persons thoughts are separate to another person’s thoughts. That’s quite something. An individual has it’s individual thoughts. But are they reliant on today or physicality’s or what. No idea.

It’s hard to think though , that our thinking about what we are , is about as far as it gets. Something is possibly going to happen when today our thoughts, whatever they are , are different to the thoughts of just a few years ago. Of course there are our survival thoughts and nothing over that means more.
But the thoughts that we have must have some sort of implication to the future. It’s not that the earliest humans couldn’t have had the thoughts we today have. They maybe could have the same thoughts but with different knowledge and different times in which to survive. It’s more that the ability to have changing thoughts , is an existence like milk and blood.
But to end , again , in the main, our evidence for any evolution is scant and is based on only a few plausible examples and huge conjectures that have been put together to prove it. There should be mountains of evidence but there is almost none. There should be much more than one liners about this fossil or or this animal etc. So for now ..

Surely no egg or fruit , or set of eyebrows , or set of teeth , or pair of lungs on earth or on any other planet uses our conjecture of evolution. Common sense says that none of these , including blood and milk or X and Y chromosomes, use random mutations and natural selection when somehow they exist in the first place. And in a simple way of thinking , the millions of different dual physical parts that make babies in millions of animals , surely don’t rely on an evolution process to be what they are. Clearly , no animal or tree relies on chance and luck.
In our case there is a man and a woman , so if we were to say that they evolved , we would have to wonder how the actual differences between them occur by evolution alone.
Everything just seems too specific to have evolved , unless it is that life was always going to evolve into what life form they eventually evolved into. But that would mean that evolution had the knowledge to enable some earlier life to turn into into a man and a woman or a tree. It would have in some way have to have known that there is a future and It would also have to know that environments change and be prepared for those changes. That would mean that in us is the propensity to change and even evolve more new senses. Somehow that doesn’t feel right.
It would mean that say in ten thousand years we need a new sense to help us in the world , a new sense would have to start to evolve at some point. It would be pretty obvious that something is happening in us all of the time if there were anything in us that was evolving.

But, as said earlier , humans will never now evolve in a normal evolution way because we wear clothes , including shoes. We could go silly in thinking and imagine that our feet and toes in the shoes will evolve in some odd way , but the reality is surely that the feet and toes would not be misguided by a pair of shoes. Firstly , the human has to make the shoes and then we’d have to believe that an evolution process would be stumped by those shoes. That would mean that an animal could evolve for say 500 million years and in a short period of time would now have to evolve the feet and toes that are now all day in a pair of shoes. That would mean that evolution couldn’t use natural selection and random mutations in the future , but in reality , probably never used them in the past. Would the number of toes change , would toe nails no longer be needed. It would go on and on of course , but it’s probably more that the foot and it’s toes can manoeuvre in a shoe before the shoe was made , and won’t or don’t need to evolve to work in a shoe just because they are in a shoe.

So , to follow , we’d have to wonder if animals were going to happen in their dualist forms before they even existed. That does feel true. So on words again , we could ask if a man and a woman were meant to come about , since they once didn’t exist. We could say that there were male and females in other animals like the monkey that evolved into the man and woman that we have today. If it wasn’t meant to be , then it would mean that evolution bungles it’s way somehow to come up with a man and a woman.

The idea that they evolved is only in our minds because there is still an ongoing effort to find the physical evidence in more fossils and DNA and genes etc to prove evolution. Those ideas though are pretty much over. There are just never ever going to be any fossils etc that explain the phenomena of a man and a woman. You and me are one or the other , and yes , it is an oddity. But to have that to happen takes a bit more than a progression.
So to end , once again , the evolution idea has had over 150 years to find evidence to explain how a man and a woman exist. The idea has come up with nothing. Therefore the specificities of life , like a man and a woman and eyes and toe nails , in a conjectural sense , could come about more likely because of the phenomena behind or in them. A physicality could or might not rely on something else. But if there is a something else, it could be the phenomena , whatever they are , that makes the physical body and body parts occur , and moves all of those physicality’s. Maybe we just can’t sense them and Is it unattainable to understand today. But thinking moves on.

But say we do try to imagine for just one moment , that the two eyes that sit in the head of a human on both sides above the nose have evolved to be there. It would mean that even the very first to be evolving eyes , that in some way weren’t eyes to start with , would have to be in the right place to start evolving into eyes. The two of them would have to evolved at the same time in the skull of a head in the first place. Then there is how the eyes sort of knew that light was there and that that light could be physically captured or strike the eyes to bring about sight. That is altogether something else.
Immediately it feels more like it’s a done in a one go occurrence. Quite how an evolution progressive process would also come up with ears on the side of the head at the same time as the brain that they are all connected to, would again say that it’s all done in one go. And it would also have to be thought that way for arms and legs and hearts etc. That is , how would they all end up perfectly situated in the place on the body that they are said to have evolved on.

Next page

Home