Extras page 1 of 3

Wikepedia The arm.

There is something about movement that we don’t understand.
We could conjecture that movement itself evolved and of course we’d find no fossils to back that idea. We could imagine that something moved a little bit millions of years ago , and got better at moving , but we’d still have to explain the first tiny amount of movement.
Moving our body is thought to occur because the thoughts in our body is moving the body. But the evidence for that is only that we think our thoughts move the body. Obviously though , movement wouldn’t have evolved. It is succinct. The ability to move must absolutely mean that the evolution idea is wrong. Movement must be a whole thing.

Take the whole arm that only bends backwards from the shoulder and not the elbow.
That means that the elbow prevents the forearm and hand from going backwards. That would mean that the forearm with the hand would move backwards if they weren’t prevented from doing so. Could movement be something that is separate from the body and the body restricts that movement.

That would mean that movement itself exists as something , but comes up against those body restrictions. The movement , whatever it is , never goes so far as pushing too much against the physicality’s of the body and that movement would move the forearm backwards if the restriction didn’t exist.
It isn’t that this type of thinking is going to get anywhere , but the evolution ideas that we have , just don’t have any bearing on the movement of the bodies that we say have evolved.

In some way when pondering about why the arms can only go this way or the other , it is not too dissimilar to parking a car between two other cars on the roadside with a kerb. It’s called parallel parking. To get a car into the space is easiest done by reversing into the space. In fact it is not possible doing it going forward in a tight space with a kerb.
It’s very difficult to understand why , but in some way nature or life knows about that. It’s very difficult to think or explain why it is that that parking and other car manoeuvres using the front wheels that turn the car going forward make going backwards very different. We learn to do it in our car with trial and error , not with thinking. Nature or whatever life is , must use the knowing of that to manoeuvre discs and joints and arms and legs without the trial and error that we ourselves use to discover it. Just seems that animal body structures don’t rely on practice to somehow evolve the setups that they have.

Pic from derekslackmotors.co.uk

That’s the only way for the car to get in that space without going onto the kerb. There must be better examples but say we take the feet. Walking forward uses the heel first and walking backwards uses the forefeet first. While we find it difficult to think about the car parking , life seems to have no problem with understanding the best way for forward or backwards walking. We ourselves don’t think about how to walk.
Walking up and down stairs though changes it to using forefeet first , and it takes no thought at all for us to make any change to how we get up or down those stairs. (not sure about wide stairs) Going downstairs is definitely forefeet first. We do though have to work out why parking the car requires trial and error to realize that the two turning wheels at the front of the car makes a difference to going forwards or backwards to get into different spaces. I think it has something with the front wheels ability to go sideward , but am struggling with it. Nature obviously doesn’t struggle with it.
Manoeuvring all the body parts at the same time is quite something. Obviously though it’s more than quite something as all of that manoeuvring has somehow come about after none of it once upon a time didn’t exist. The evolution idea mainly concentrates on animals changing into a more successful animal using natural selection and random mutations , but we wouldn’t imagine that the two feet at the end of a pair of legs were there to do anything else other than enable us to walk. Of course though a toddler does wobble as they discover the the ability of how to use them , but the feet with toes are there and there is absolutely no evidence at all that they evolved to be what they are and to do what they can do.

What stands out in this kind of thinking is that nothing must go wrong with the feet at any time over millions of years. Just seems that there has to be a certainty about it all, otherwise every body part like feet would just collapse. Problem with that thought though , is that since life started about half a billion years ago , and it was a certainty from then on that life would still exist today , then why would that certainty , whatever it is , have hardship for every single animal that ever existed . To produce the complexities of a body and it’s consciousness and movement must have come with that certainty , but why the hardship. No idea.


Notes .. Important aspect of life. Being able to write down thoughts -into words on a page-otherwise they would be gone. You can’t keep a book in the head. If you have one and want to write it in say retirement , make/write down some bullet points for that time. For example , i discovered how the brain works the other day while driving. Now i have forgotten what i was thinking. Not really. But did have a couple of thoughts and now can’t remember them.

Longman dictionary. A baby has eyebrows.

A baby is very fascinated in our reaction to what they do. It’s a two way thing of course. But they love it when they see us reacting to what they do. Even if the baby makes a tiny eye movement and they see us seeing it they absolutely love it. They have never lived before and have no knowledge of anything and are just there. But they have this immense ability of seeing what we do when they do something.

And most importantly, never fall out with your dentist.

Language, say English , we might think evolved from a grunt to the thousands of words strung together in sentences that we have. The voice box gives the sound out of words understandable to the listener who uses the same language. We could imagine that words and sentences could have evolved , but given that there exist lots of languages we might think that there is an ability that exists that is very different from allowing random mutations and natural selection to let that happen . No language on earth would use our evolution idea as the listener is able to understand the speaker.
We study bird vocalization and on listening they make similar sounds. It’s perhaps more the spacing between the sounds that they make , that say alert other birds to danger and lots of other things.
And memory might also be more a sequencing of the same thing. That is , that rather than thinking of memory of as say holding a music song or melody , the music song or melody is a possibility there before ever hearing the song in the first place. All that we know is that we have heard the song before. It wouldn’t have to mean that it was new to the memory on first hearing the song. The sequence of the sound could be just sound but sequenced differently.
It could be much like sight is seeing the same colours and shapes of what is being seen. The sight sees the colour blue , but it’s the same blue as the blue that has been seen before. It doesn’t mean that the colour blue is new every time we see blue. Same with sound. Yes , the memory of it is more difficult to think about , as when we hear a tune or song that we know , we can sort of skip ahead when listening to the tune or song in our head knowing how it goes. But when we are doing that kind of recall their is no volume level in that recall. So we aren’t exactly hearing. And we can bring up in our head the voice of someone that we know but it doesn’t seem that we are hearing it, Anyway , someone might come up with something , and that might happen soon and in our time , as the evolution idea is pretty much over.

It’s simple. Where do legs come from and how do they stand up so precisely in the earths gravity.
The massive word Evolution doesn’t do that. It would mean that evolution itself was itself a sort of living thing and would have to have had a head start to get the weights of bodies right to settle in that gravity.

Next page

Home