Extras page 2 of 4

We can single out any body part to wonder about how any of them evolved.
The eye is often the most used as it leads to sight , but since it is made of squishy substances , then there are no fossil records of it having evolved. All that exists from the past are eye sockets in the skeleton of where eyes would have once been.
The conjecture made though in evolution theory , without any evidence , is that eyes came into existence because they evolved from substances that were not eyes.
It’s difficult though to compare how they evolved in a similar way to animals that are said to have evolved because they hopped and skipped and paddled in the water and became other animals like the bird or the whale.
So we can say for certainty with our thinking that eyes didn’t evolve because of any movement that they had in the past , like hopping or jumping or skipping . That would be the same for any other sensing organ like ears and noses.
In simple thinking , eyes exist and we don’t know how.

In the world of conjecture though , we could think the following.
If eyes did evolve to become eyes , that would mean that the phenomena or idea of the eye proceeded the evolution of the eye. That would have to be because eyes are there to help with seeing or sight , so we could say , that eyes evolved to see.
So we could next think that the phenomena used evolution to make the eye.
But then , we would have to think that the phenomena of the to be eyes , would have to be considered more incredible than the evolving physical eyes , and that would make us wonder why the phenomena of an eye that leads to seeing would need to evolve the actual physical eye.
But given the phenomena’s incredibleness of knowing what would be needed to take in light to do the seeing thing , we would think that surely the phenomena could just bring about the physical eye without having to physically evolve it using the ideas of natural selection acting on random mutations.
So , since there is no evidence of an eye evolving , we must assume that an eye would not evolve into an eye unless it was going to evolve into an eye before it evolved into an eye , if it ever did evolve.
As mentioned earlier , the physical size of say a human eye has to be specific , otherwise eyes just a bit larger would be exposed to too much danger. That would mean that even the size of eyes is brought about by the phenomena of them , rather than it being that the size of them evolved.

Then , if we think of the animals that now have eyes , and we imagine the amount of evolving that would be going on today with millions of animals that have eyes , then the evolving possibilities would become exponential. Obviously that doesn’t occur as life would be sort of uncontrollable. That’s not to say that life is controllable , but there is some sense in thinking that say in a forest , that is the amount of life that can exist.
But if there was some sort of let it all happen , then gazillions of worms and snails and humans would be evolving on a daily basis , and they don’t.
So , the phenomena that produces new animals every so often , using the same sort of organs and senses , could in some way be around us , in the atmosphere or in some other dimension , ready to bring about the new. Bit flowery there, but the evolution idea does need a rethink.
That rethink is already happening though , noticeably in nature programmes. The word adapted is being more and more used over the word evolved. However , if an animal adapted a feature to cope with it’s environment , we’d still have to say that that adaptation evolved , unless the adaptation occurred in one go , almost overnight or in the one baby of any animal.
But it always comes to how is a man a man, and how is a woman , through either adaptation or evolution or maybe the phenomena of them. And how do they fancy each other. No idea.

Next page

Home