How do animals fancy each other page 3 of 4

The earth was tilted years ago and we have different seasons. Animals and plants could be as varied on each individual planet because all planets will have their own tilts etc. So different animals and plants to here might exist on other planets to live on or suit their environment.

So all planets will have their different tilt etc. So maybe no two planets are exactly the same, and even if each planet has a just one novel species today , that’s billions and billions of different fancying. And that number is based on just this moment in time. Each planet will have its today number of animal species and plants but then there is each planets past and the future ones. It would mean that different animals on differently tilted planets fancy their own species. So we would have to ask how do animals fancy each other. That completely rules out an evolution process.

( .. Wasn’t going to bring it up again , but those numbers of planets with life on , that’s even more horror on a stupendous scale .. no more horror , promise )

So our white polar bear wont exist on a planet if there is no snow. It might be a different colour though. It’s hard to think of how so many brain set ups could make any animal fancy another in their species. Again an elephant fancies an elephant and a fly fancies a fly.

It is important to point out that our thinking about the fancying ones own species would lead us to think that since there are 8 million species with 8 million different body plans on earth today then the brain or whatever would easily make 8 million types of fancying. But there is a big difference between the numbers of species and body plans compared to the numbers of fancying. Animals are made of flesh and blood , arms and legs , eyes and ears and chemicals and atoms molecules etc. So even though there are 8 million species , they are made of similar body parts made from the same physical material that has happened in the past. But the consciousness of fancying is a novel and unique singularity. Each one has never been done before. An ant fancies an ant. Even if we think that the ant evolved we’d have to recognise that the ant likes to be with other ants. It’s an altogether different thing to say that the ants liking of other ants evolved alongside it’s body evolution.

So flesh and blood and hair and eyes existed 500 million years ago. But a dinosaur fancying another dinosaur didn’t occur until over 400 million years later. It had legs and flesh and a heart and a brain and teeth etc. Those physical parts of body had existed before. But the fancying in dinosaur Tyrannosaurus rex fancying another Tyrannosaurus rex had never existed before. And penguins came along 60 million years ago then frogs and rabbits and humans. And they all fancy their own species. So where did all that new fancying come from. That is so different to flesh and blood.

We can say for certain that natural selection is not involved in makeing one animal fancy it’s own species. That is because no other type of fancying would have occured in say for example an octopus. An octopus fancies an octopus. Those octopuses that fancied other octopuses weren’t selected from octopuses that fancied crocodiles. Then it would follow that any use of our human idea of natural selection is absolutely weak. Everything else like body parts and chemicals in a body and the senses and the consciousness thing wouldn’t rely on natural selection.

I have spotted a bit of a flaw or maybe hurdle in my numbers thinking above there and anyone might see it. Can you? ( Just revisited and can’t remember the flaw. I think it was something to do with all human faces are different and recognisable) But carrying on , if you put a sewing needle point on a piece of paper then you have the brain size of a butterfly. That brain would have to have the properties to flap the wings , see , navigate the landscape , see and find food and have the fancying of its own type of butterfly.

Since life is capable of say specifically making an otter fancy an otter , or a butterfly to fancy another butterfly, why then when it could do that would it rely on random mutations and natural selection to produce the fur to keep an animal warm or the teeth to chew food or the blood to carry oxygen around a body.

We could think that fancying ones own species is learnt in some way through the mind thing but there are animals that don’t even meet their parents. An animal will instantly fancy it’s own species. It’s been wondered about in fiction. Tarzan was fascinated with Jane when he met her. He had only seen monkeys before. That ahh ahh hah (you tube) noise he made might have been made when he met her. But I think in the films he was making that yodel noise before he met her.

Isn’t that nice.

They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But Tarzan fancied the first woman he ever met. Reminds me of when my friend at school came to stay for the weekend. He was so fascinated with my sister that I was left out of everything. That attraction has nothing to do with random mutations and natural selection. Since that can occur, why would a whole animal or plant use such bonkers ideas

And there is another in comedy called Red Dwarf where Kryten the robot/android is duped into falling in love for another like his own. She the trickster just makes herself look like his species. But when she reveals her true self and he sees her as something completely different like a blob he still likes her. Mabey not quite fancying her but still wants to carry on the relationship. But Can’t find the clip. Oh it’s here. BBC Episode 9mins 24 secs in.

Next page

Home